Betalisering och allmänt chode - hur vända?

[Entreprenören]

asså det här med betalisering minns jag när jag läste det ur Practical Female Psychology for the practical man, och jag blev rätt jävla illamående efteråt. för där står det:

"Stages of Female Manipulation
A woman's attempt to own you mentally will follow certain
incremental stages, which predictably occur with mathematical
precision. We will now discuss each of the following stages in
detail:
• Testing the Male
• Seeking Communication
• Putting him to Work
• Evolutionary Selfishness
• Self-Determination

Depending on the woman's self-esteem, there are big differences
in the way these stages will play themselves out. If a
woman has high self-esteem (HSE), she will test you and manipulate
you in a totally different way than a woman who has
low self-esteem (LSE).

Testing the Male
"Let me be a little bitch to him." A woman knows on the instinctual
level - and also on the rational level - that a man can impregnate a
large number of women without too many consequences.

In our modem age of mandatory child support,
this is not always true in practical terms, but biologically it remains
the case that the female has a much higher risk and burden
when it comes to pregnancy than the man does.
A woman also knows that a weak male will not be able to protect
her or her children in any way. Imagine as a man how
your thoughts about survival would be different if every time
you made love to a woman you faced the possibility of carrying
a baby in your belly for the next nine months, followed by
the primary responsibility of taking care of the baby for many
years to come. Imagine how you would feel if you knew that
your partner could leave you at any time and impregnate other
women and/or leave for war or for hunting. Get the picture?
You would become much more selective in your choices of who
to mate with.

From this biological reality stems the deep need that a woman
has to test the male for his physical and leadership qualities. In
our modem society, the need to test for physical qualities and
financial stability has become less important than the need for
qualities such as leadership, intellectual capacity, and strength
of personality; but that would be quickly reversed in the case
of war.

One thing is for sure: a woman in this stage will test the male
for his skill of being a hunter. This will happen whether you
are skilled in hunting animals in the grassy field or company
shares in the business field; you can be sure that at the first
stage of manipulation a woman will test you.

A woman will always test a male who she is sexually attracted
to. For a psychologically healthy woman, survival and sexual
desire must always harmonize with each other. A woman who
tests men only for survival benefits - such as a man's ability to
provide - is denying her sexuality. A woman who tests men
only for their sexual appeal, is either planning to live her life
without men, or is being self-destructive.

Seeking Communication
"Open up to me, please."
Once a woman has tested the male, and is relatively sure that
he is strong enough to serve her purposes, her concern begins
to revolve around making the man serve her exclusively. Many
men who are relatively strong and pass the tests of the first
stage, fail to understand the meaning of this second stage. This
stage is extremely difficult for the average man to detect. It is
instinctually and often unconsciously masked by the woman
as a purely innocent attempt to "communicate" with the male.
It is a feature of the feminine psyche to appreciate communication
above all else, but from an evolutionary point of view
what the female of our species is really doing at this stage is using
language to befuddle her partner, which will hopefully cause
him to serve her and her purposes.

This stage is extremely important to the success or failure of
couple relationships. Couple therapy fails so frequently because
it tends to disregard the real, evolutionary meaning of
this stage. A very common pitfall for couples is when the woman
starts to feel that the man is displaying an inability or unwillingness
to "communicate properly" with the woman. Modern
couples therapy almost invariably places the blame for this
supposed lack of communication squarely on the man's shoulders.
In the first stage, the woman has screened out the weaker males;
the man was specifically chosen by the woman for a relationship.
In this second stage, the woman acts as if she is seeking
deeper communication with the man. A strong man will start
to sense that an attempt is being made to weaken him, and he
will then usually react with certain predictable behavior patterns.
He may get angry or he may withdraw. Arguments that
seem to the man to be based on nothing logical at all will often
occur at this stage.

Putting Him to Work
"Honey, please take out the trash and wash the cat, and please
hurry!" When and if a man opens himself emotionally up to a
woman - in the sense of what we discussed in the preceding
subsection - from that point onwards the woman effectively
owns the frame of the relationship. Now, the active destruction
of attraction can begin in earnest, as she starts her attempts to
take over aspects of the man's life which directly affect his material
interests. For example, purchase decisions can now be
made "jointly" which, in the cool light of rational analysis, really
are the result of the woman's manipulation attempts and
the man's desire to maintain some semblance of peace in the
household.

Female Evolutionary Selfishness

"I am never satisfied no matter what you do or how hard you
try." This stage begins once the woman has succeeded in having
her formerly-strong male open up to her emotionally. In
this stage, any communication with her male partner is only
for the purpose of deriving something useful for her and her
children. At this stage she will exhibit a total disregard for the
man's psychological and material interests. The man will be
put under the power of a strong and constant psychological
double bind, along the lines of:

"If you don't open up to me I am not satisfied. You don't communicate
with me."

simultaneous with

"As soon as you open up to me I will use the information you
provide in a totally selfish way for my own needs."
Either way, the end result for the male is usually guilt, shame,
or confusion, finally giving way to resentment and anger. Assuming
he takes her seriously - and most men do - he will
get caught into an ongoing psychological mechanism, which
will make him weaker and weaker, with terribly-negative results
for her sexual attraction towards him. At this stage, he is
no longer the strong llldh~ she admired at the beginning.

Female Self-Determination
"1 am full grown, independent woman now." Of course, the
female in the relationship never was a "little girl."
In the selfdetermination stage, however, another double bind - even
more powerful than the preceding - will be thrown at the
male. Once he starts to seek out the emotional communication
that she had been asking for all along, she will begin to express
sentiments such as she is feeling oppressed, or that the man is
boring, or that he is too nice, or that he doesn't understand her,
and so on. Again, the usual effect of such feminine expressions
on the man is bewilderment, shame and guilt.

If at this point the man decides that he does not care at all
about what she says or does, she will assert that "he is not a
loving husband/boyfriend" or "I cannot live with him because
he does not understand me," or "I do not feel anything for him
anymore," or "sex without communication is a tum off"; once
again inducing some very negative feelings within the man.
In the Self-Determination Stage, the female expresses her resentment
and dissatisfaction with the relationship. This happens
virtually without exception in the case of male partners
who have become progressively psychologically weaker with
time.

Men who are able to pass through these stages without a corresponding
decrease in their women's sexual attraction towards
them are exceptionally-strong men. These men avoid becoming
psychologically weaker through the process. We believe
that such men are more the exception than the norm. It is much
better for nature to first create attraction between a male and a
female and soon after have it decrease. That helps to ensure
both a safe upbringing of the offspring as well as more sexual
interactions with other sexual partners, which in tum results in
more offspring and a wider spreading of genetic materials.

This is not much different from what happens with many animal
species, including species where the female kills the male
after copulation. In the case of humans, this "killing" happens
on the psychological level. The killing of human males by their

female partners is largely symbolic, but we must also take into
account those men who take this process so seriously that they
start to destroy their health through the abuse of alcohol or
drugs, or start to abuse their partners, or even murder their
partners or commit suicide.
In other words, permanently-monogamous sexual relationships
are not necessarily natural. They are partly a modern, social
construct. Or, put another way, they are a social construct, the
evolutionary purpose of which lasts for as long as Nature considers
it useful.

Manipulation End-Game
In traditional, male-dominated societies, if the female cannot
leave the relationship when her attraction evaporates through
the process discussed above, the end result is often clinical depression
and/or cheating. Clinical depression occurs when her
sexual attraction for her mate decreases or dies out completely,
and she is prevented from having sex with other males by social
restraint. The woman in this case has to face a practically
impossible conflict between her emotions, which demand sexual
satisfaction, and her societally-restrained behavior, which
prohibits sexual satisfaction.

In modern, politically-correct societies, a common end result
of the manipulation process is the woman ending the relationship,
or acting in such a way that the man has no other choice
but to end the relationship. Infidelity is very likely to happen
in either case.

Psychological counseling and family therapy usually fail to help
couples in this situation because they start from the shaky assumption
that exclusive committed relationships are always
"healthy" and that having sex with different partners is "sick."
They also fail miserably in detecting the slow and dangerous
psychological process whereby the mind of the male is confronted
with schizophrenic double messages from the female,
which would be considered to fit the clinical definition of Bor-
derline Personality Disorder by most experienced clinicians on
the planet.

Usually what happens in therapy and psychological counseling
in the western world is that the male is made to be the
scapegoat of a process which has been actively maintained by
the female. There are some professionals who understand this
process better than most, but they often do not have the courage
to speak out about it. On a meta-level, what is happening with
this social process is simply another evolutionary mechanism,
one which allows for more pregnancies and for the upbringing
of children in the most viable way possible.

There is certainly a strong cultural influence at work here and
it behooves men to understand these forces and to work hard
to make themselves strong men who do not succumb easily to
female manipulation. Above all, a man with children should
start from the premise that he is an equally important and vital
link to a child's psychological well being. There are countless
studies which show that statistically, children do better in every
social and psychological respect when they enjoy the equal
influences of a healthy male and a healthy female parent."

Det här är det vidrigaste jag läst om kvinnopsykologi och jag undrar mkt som faktiskt stämmer överens med verkligheten och vad som är mer kvinnohat än faktiskt empiri. Så andra får fylla i här. Men det är sjukt intressant samtidigt som det är vidrigt och ibland undrar jag ens hur vissa ens lyckas ha flickvänner utan otrohet!

[quote=AplAy]http://www.google.se/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&e...ODbDiDkC1Q

världens länk men leder direkt till pdf-fil som nån lagt upp, denna bok är en gammal goding från 20-talet! ^^,[/QUOTE]

Ha? Vad babblar du om? David deida är född 1958 så tvivlar starkt på att boken är "en gammal goding från 20-talet! ^^"

mjo, men boken e tydligen skriven 1997 nått så i närheten. han kom troligen inte på grejerna redan när han var 20, så troligen gick han sin resa innan han upptäckte vad det innebar att vara en attraktiv man, eller superior som han sj uttrycker det. jag tanka hem boken nu igen å ska läsa den då jag bara skumma igenom den senast jag kom över den.